?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Fri, May. 19th, 2006, 08:20 pm
Okay, Internet people, we're straightening this out /right now/.

So, they're RSS feeds, right? I've heard people mention their RSS feeders, which feed RSS feeds. We're staring down a semantic nightmare right here. What's being fed to what? Is some digital entity eating our content? (The horror!) The RSS is like a roll of tape, which is being fed into aggrandizing clients like Thunderbird or server-side ones like LJ pleasently features. What we're reading is the RSS content from the feed after our programs start recieving the feed, right?

Sun, May. 21st, 2006 05:12 am (UTC)
masstreble

I've been told Atom is better for the same purpose -- RSS is supposedly kind of hacked-together? I don't know, I just read the content and bend with the digital waves.

You ever notice how vore humor is always some species of "and then I ate it!"? I guess there are kinks that are better stages for humor, though.

Sun, May. 21st, 2006 09:28 pm (UTC)
(Anonymous)

RSS and Atom are basically two standards that do exactly the same thing. (Actually, there are RSS 0.9 and RSS 2.0, which are also different, thus adding to the confusion!)

Wed, May. 31st, 2006 09:17 am (UTC)
cgranade

Yeah... RSS is hacked together. It isn't properly encapsulated in an XML namespace, making verification and combination with other namespaces impossible. RSS gives RSS and that's it. None of the nice benefits of XML other than a unified parser.